Demonstrating and Evaluating Teaching Proficiency
SLU guidelines
- provide support to demonstrate teaching skills or assess them
1. Teaching proficiency - a short background
- proficiency: ability to perform instruction and carry out examination
- late 20th century: paradigm shoft from “providing instruction” to “producing learning”
- teaching proficiency: proficiency in planning, performing and evaluating teaching, including ability to motivate teaching methods and refklect on them
- teaching skills requirement for professor or lecturer, equal weight to scientific skills
- good practice in education:
- Encourages contacts between students and faculty
- Develops reciprocity and cooperation among students
- Uses active learning techniques
- Gives prompt feedback
- Emphasizes time on task
- Communicates high expectations
- Respects diverse talents and ways of learning
- 4 dimensions: Context –> Knowledge and approaches – Planning –> Teaching
- 3 progressive levels of early stage teachers’ views:
- Who the student is: learning is primarily defined by the students’ personal characteristics: some ar gifted and some are not
- What the teacher does: learning is primarily defined by what the teacher does: how she teaches
- What the student does: learning is a result of the learning activities the students engage in, and it is determined by the students’ previous experiences and the learning environment they find themselves in
- also 3 progressive levels for proficient teachers:
- excellent: proficient in the classroom, teaching is experienced as effective by colleagues and students
- expert:
- excellent plus theoretical knowledge about teaching and learning
- combine subject knowlege and practical knowledge of teaching
- continuous self-development and adaptation in teaching methods
- scholarship of teaching and learning: excellent + expert + sharing and promoting knowledge on the general development of teaching: conferences, articles, etc.
2. Documenting teaching skills - the teaching portfolio
- two types of teaching portfolios:
- personal:
- extensive documentation together with reflections
- course evaluations, testimonials from course leaders, material produced, certificates, etc.
- all kind of situations you helped people, being a coach, private support
- include negative experiences
- everything is valuable
- specific: assembled for special purpose
- What have I done? How did I do it? Why did I do it this way? What was the result?
- personal:
What serves as evidence of teaching proficiency?
- pedagogical self-reflection:
- What I teach
- How I teach
- Why I teach the way I do
- What results do I achieve
- teaching philosophy (pedagogical standpoint):
- what is knowledge
- existing limits for what is possible to know
- how learning happens
- what is important to know
- how should we teach
- should match your actual way of teaching
-
A well-structured philosophy can be formulated citing the literature.
- most important: philosophy in action
- self-reflection:
- penetrate all aspects of a teacher’s role
- trace own development as a teacher over time
- include merits
- for example self-development during participation in a teaching course
- Constructive alignment
- important is what the students do, not what the teacher does
- deep knowledge needs personal activity
- active learning way more useful than just bein able to preach
- rather teach less but deeper
- mere participation does not demonstrate teaching skills
- desciption of significance of the course for own development
- expansion of vision as a teacher, influence on student learning
- for example self-development during participation in a teaching course
- ideas for future development (personal, at the department)
3. Requesting or writing a testimonial of teaching skills
To be done.
4. Evaluating teaching proficiencey
To be done.
My questions and comments
- In the seven principles for good teaching (Table 1), what does “Emphasizes time on task” mean?
- My teaching was long ago, I did not care about certificates, course evaluations, or testimonials for in Germany nobody cares about. How does this impede future applications in Sweden?